Writing for Marketing

Posted in BIC HOK, personal experience, process on June 12th, 2008 by stanmanx

I wrote marketing copy at my company for a while. It was kind of off and on, and they recently hired someone else who is going to be taking over (thankfully). A more scholarly person would draw comparisons between writing fiction and writing to sell stuff, but all I have to say is that in both cases you are making stuff up.

The experience was kind of eye-opening for me. At first I was excited about learning a new technique, and how to think from a different perspective. But it got old. Especially when I was writing glowing praises for a piece of software that is as bugged as the Nixon-era White House. Most especially when I learned that a customer had already been using said software for over a year.

The boss man is a smart guy. He knows stuff. He also has a tendency to assume his employees know nothing, so meetings with him last forever. In those meetings, he spent a lot of time talking about how placing restraints on the creative process allows for more potent creativity from the writer — something I have long believed, on account of everything I’ve read and written. But he also wanted to come up with a Detailed Marketing Copy Writing and Editing Super Good Stuff Process so that a person with no knowledge of our software could write the same calibur marketing documents that I could (note: I’m involved in design and testing, so I know our software pretty well). This is where I start to smell something funny.

I’m going to assume that anyone reading this is somewhat familiar with the hero’s journey. I think it’s a wonderful outline for an epic tale. However, I think it takes more than just that outline to craft a good story. A writer needs to approach the hero’s journey with unique characters, different settings, and an assortment of devices to set it apart from every other hero’s journey. So why not create a more specific hero’s journey template? It could include all of the stock characters you need, all of the locations, and even the conversations that need to happen. Excellent! What happens after someone writes that story? Do we just keep writing the same one over and over, and just change the names?

That was pretty much what my experience with marketing copy was, only I spent far, far more time creating outlines and templates for writing pieces than I did actually writing them. It was ridiculous.

And the boss actually made a comment at one point about how marketing writing was useful, unlike fiction or something you write “for yourself.” Sure thing. Deception in the name of filling someone else’s pockets. I’m not sure how that’s useful, since people will be pretty pissed off when our programs crash and halt their productivity.

Let’s Try This Again

Posted in BIC HOK, excuses, personal experience on June 4th, 2008 by stanmanx

This is me identifying a problem and attempting a solution.

Today a buddy of mine found out I have a blog. I mentioned that I don’t write in it very often, and he said, “Aren’t you a writer?”

Keep reading ‘Let’s Try This Again’

Holy Crap, Reading is Awesome

Posted in BIC HOK, personal experience on May 7th, 2008 by stanmanx

So I haven’t posted in a while. Oops…

I had a pretty amazing experience last week. It was almost like fulfilling a prophecy, since it was repeatedly foretold by writing professors and the guides by professional writers.

Keep reading ‘Holy Crap, Reading is Awesome’

Arthur C. Clarke

Posted in personal experience, writers I admire on March 19th, 2008 by stanmanx

Arthur C. Clarke died. I don’t consider myself a rabid fan of his (I haven’t even read 2001), but I own one of his books. I still haven’t even read the whole thing, which makes me feel weird for saying he has had an enormous impact on my imagination and the way I approach writing.

My first encounter with Mr. Clarke’s writing was a story called “The Nine Billion Names of God”. It was in one of my lit textbooks, though it was not assigned reading for the class. I was flipping through the book to get to the forgettable classic I was required to read that night and the title caught my eye. The author’s name looked familiar, but I didn’t know where I’d seen it before. I decided to give the story a go.

Obviously I wouldn’t be writing this if I hadn’t been mesmerized. The story was short, but the characters all had the kind of depth that lit professors gush over. On top of that, and probably the reason it wasn’t included in my class, the events that took place were a few levels beyond ordinary. This wasn’t another politically-charged story about a guy who experiences the same things I go through every day — this was an exploration of our assumptions about reality, played out in some unnamed mountains, with an unspecified religious order and a couple technicians from a computer company. It was different from the drivel that is force-fed to English majors. It was fresh. I wanted more.

Of course, school being what it is, I soon found myself swimming in papers and readings and forgot about the concept of “leisure reading.” It was more or less an accident that I stumbled upon the massive tome of Clarke stories. As I said before, I haven’t read the entire book. The thing is huge, and I had some other things I wanted to read — things that fit more neatly in my backpack. What I did read, though, was amazing. It’s been over a year now… I hope I can find that book when I move.

What to Write

Posted in content, genre, personal experience on January 21st, 2008 by stanmanx

I’ve been kicking this post around for a while, and I’m never really sure what it is I want to say with it. Bear with me while I ramble.

Keep reading ‘What to Write’